this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2023
664 points (93.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2712 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

New housing is built all the time, just not in a places that are in demand where everyone wants to live at.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean you don't want to live in a 500k townhouse that is directly off the highway and has no walkability, sidewalks, or public transportation? Smh

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean you don’t want to live in a 500k townhouse that is directly off the highway and has no walkability, sidewalks, or public transportation? Smh

Plenty of nice housing in suburbs that are away from the central in-demand urban areas. You'll have to commute allot, or work from home.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right it's a shame that lower class individuals can no longer pay the cost of personal transportation and companies are demanding return to in office work to keep their property investments secure.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right it’s a shame that lower class individuals can no longer pay the cost of personal transportation

Well I didn't invent Capitalism, I'm just stuck in it just, like you.

For those lower class individuals (I'm guessing you meant to say lower wage individuals) they just need to try to improve their life, career choice changes, more education, and so forth. Otherwise they have to live within their means and commute long distances, just like we all do.

If you want to have a separate conversation about getting rid of Capitalism for something else, so be it, but while we are in Capitalism those are the ways to being able to own a place to live at, you afford what you can pay for.

and companies are demanding return to in office work to keep their property investments secure.

Yeah this one pisses me off big time as well.

I think everyone should be able to work from home, it would make the point that we're discussing about having to move far away from the urban center locations to be able to afford a home moot.

It's not all of us responsibility to help those who purchase real estate to keep afloat.

Having said that, there are still plenty of jobs that allow work from home, either all the time, or the majority of the time.

You should never stay at the same place more than a couple of years anyway, and with such high demand for workers right now, this is the time to move from a company that's denying work from home availability to a company that does allow it, or even promotes it.

And if you're a low wage individual who can't move, then you have a whole other set of problems you need to fix, that I discussed earlier about in this reply.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey pompous asshole. Who is going to work at grocery stores if you can't afford living anywhere but a suburb and can't even afford that.

Who will work restaurants and small venues. Not every job can be remote and commuting long distances for "low wage" jobs which don't cover the cost means no one servicing everything else you do besides work.

You are thinking about only people like yourself and ignoring all the people I guess you don't even consider thinking about.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hey pompous asshole.

Screw you. I'm only speaking to truth, things I've done myself. Things that I've actually DONE myself.

Who will work restaurants and small venues. Not every job can be remote and commuting long distances for “low wage” jobs which don’t cover the cost means no one servicing everything else you do besides work.

In the city I live in they have a trolley/bus system that people who can't afford to live in the expensive areas take to get to/from work.

You going to tell me that the majority of low-income workers live in a city without metro?

You are thinking about only people like yourself and ignoring all the people I guess you don’t even consider thinking about.

If that was true I wouldn't bother making comments and responding to people like you on the Internet. There's no joy in it. Just trying to contribute to society by speaking to the truth of things. I ain't fighting for my soul, I'm fighting for yours.

Also, don't get pissed at me for stating the rules of Capitalism, I didn't invent the fucker nor do I support it (much). I'm just stating things you can do today to improve your life under the current system we all live in.

Don't like that, start a Revolution, or run for Congress.

Edit:

https://lemmy.world/comment/3545962

God finding out I pay twice as much a month for a shitty apartment than what someone I know does for a mansion out in the suburbs which keeps me from ever being actually able to get enough money saved to put a down payment (that is constantly rising higher) to even hope to get a house so that I’m not paying whatever someone feels like charging me for necessity housing…

Yeah that shit is crushing.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Developers want to build anywhere and everywhere people would rent or buy, only thing holding em back is state zoning, licensing/permits, and far off in the distance (i.e. not right now), an actual lack of demand for housing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, of course. The real estate market is behaving in a way that is highly consistent with economic theory. It's so straightforward that just about any policy analyst from anywhere on the political spectrum could come up with the same exact list of problems. I think we can all appreciate that developers are merely trying to operate a business and that they owe it to themselves and their workers to operate sustainably and only take reasonable profit/risk tradeoffs.

Unfortunately, an appreciation for the underlying theory does not satisfy. Every day I walk one of the most unequal cities in America (Atlanta, GA) and am pained to see homeless bodies huddled against buildings made of solid granite. Just imagine if I tried explaining the economic realities of the housing market to the disabled veteran panhandling at my local MARTA station. Imagine his face as I tell him to please try moving to a suburb or maybe just be patient and wait things out for a few decades while we wait for the real estate market to respond to demand forces. He cannot wait. Exposure will eventually kill him.

I want my city to do what only governments can do and respond to the problem immediately at whatever cost necessary. I want public housing built ASAP because a heartbreaking number of local people are going to die if action is delayed. It is not humane to turn a blind eye while we go and chase the white whale of an economically ideal market solution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You're welcome, visible comment maker.