this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
374 points (95.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2388 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spaghettiwestern 104 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A report from the staff of Denver Arts & Venues says three people complained at intermission and included this tidbit about what Boebert said as she left the building: “stuff like ‘do you know who I am,’ ‘I am on the board’ (and) ‘I will be contacting the mayor.’ ”

Boebert is not on the board of Denver’s Center for the Performing Arts.

Boebert is the queen of the Karens.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Literally nobody named Karen is that big of a shitbag.

[–] spaghettiwestern 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's too bad another, less common label didn't come into common usage. I've known a number of Karens (and a couple of Chads) that were just people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Chad is a name I had never heard before rhe memes is it common in the US?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

"Chad" is an old English name. In WWII, it was used by British soldiers in a form of the "Kilroy was here" meme. It was not common in the US prior to the 1940s, so we can hazard a guess that Americans picked it up from Brits during WWII.

It peaked in popularity for baby boys in the early 1970s. Around 20 years later, it became identified as a stereotypical name for an upper-class "frat boy" in Chicago. The more recent slang usage is a distant descendant of that usage.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chad_(name)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kilroy_was_here

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

The fact it was old English kinda blows my mind. I'm from Scotland and never once heard it. Interesting read thank you

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It was a popular name for boys born in the 70s and 80s.

[–] spaghettiwestern 1 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The majority of all names are good people, but if there is one name that has a higher percentage of assholes than others it is probably Karen

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Totally unscientific, but I work in 911 dispatch and I'd say that off the top of my head probably the most common name I get for Karen-type calls is probably Carol, the male equivalent in probably Alan

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Solid boomer names. I’d say Karen’s are more gen-x names. Like I’d think it was a popular baby name in the 60s through 80s.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Lauren is a close second.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Given how naming entitled women Karen is an insult to women actually named Karen, I propose we replace "Karen" with Boebert.

For example: "She asked to see the manager because I wouldn't honor this expired $1 off coupon for our competitor. Then she said 'do you know who I am?!!!' She's such a Boebert."