this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
1325 points (97.4% liked)

Clever Comebacks

1188 readers
1 users here now

Posts of clever comebacks in response to someone.

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing is allowed but when used to insult someone.
  2. Discussion is encouraged, but only in good faith. No arguing for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor names/identifying info of everyone who isn’t a public figure.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy this community in the light hearted manner it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I didn't cap anything. There are realistic limits to what you can give to charity. Give a charity that normally gets a few millions a billion and they won't be able to spend it in any normal way. Breeds corruption, etc.

Charity shouldn't even exist, as it is always this patch on holes left by governments. Tax the rich until they are "normal rich" and then use that money for projects that normally would require charity

Also, his wife actually had the exact same situation I just described. She spent millions over millions and once done she had more wealth than she started with

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only there were more than one charity, worldwide.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No.

If only governments would tax the rich properly they'd have enough money to put good social programs in place. We wouldn't need charity.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

There will always be a use of some sort of charity until we live in a post-scarcity world.