this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
1322 points (97.3% liked)

Clever Comebacks

1133 readers
1 users here now

Posts of clever comebacks in response to someone.

Rules:

  1. Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing is allowed but when used to insult someone.
  2. Discussion is encouraged, but only in good faith. No arguing for arguments sake.
  3. No bigotry of any kind.
  4. Censor names/identifying info of everyone who isn’t a public figure.
  5. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before you’re banned.
  6. Enjoy this community in the light hearted manner it’s intended.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 64 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Bezos pledged 40 billion (maybe 20, can't remember) I believe in 2019.

To date he has actually donated less than $200 million of it IIRC to any climate-related funds.

It's just a bold face lie, not even taking his own charity scams into account.

Edit: also side rant: I have gotten a lot of wallstreetbets armchair investors in the past saying "b-b-but muh liquid vs assets, he would crash amazon stock."

Bezos has liquidated a minimum of $12 billion per year without even a slight blip in amazon stock. PLENTY to fulfil his pledge. People don't understand the scale of sold shares. The stock market is completely speculative bs. If he liquidated every stock of amazon in a short time after an anouncement like this, investors would absolutely speculate that it would recover, the price would lower for a week or so while every hedge fund in existence rushes to buy every single stock that they have and voila, it would magically recover within a month and bozo would not be a complete lying scumbag. It would probably cause him to be audited though which is every bilionaire's nightmare because they have all done such shady things and dodges so many taxes for so many years. At least if the IRS had any balls.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Hey, don't attack the man based on his follicles!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm just envious that he doesn't have to shave. It's really tedious.

[–] Lucidlethargy 3 points 11 months ago

This is totally correct, but the incorrect usage is so common now that "bold face" has become arguably accepted.

Originally it was "barefaced", I believe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

True a long time ago it was, but if we want to disregard language evolution, then it is actually "bare-faced lie" lol

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/is-that-lie-bald-faced-or-bold-faced-or-barefaced