Gaming

19549 readers

225 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

555

Bethesda says most of Starfield's 1000+ planets are dull on purpose because 'when the astronauts went to the moon, there was nothing there' but 'they certainly weren't bored' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

238 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sure Todd, lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (2 children)

How the fuck did Beth have stairs in FO4/76 but forgot to add them in a game set hundreds of years in the future? What the seventy-dollar fuck?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That's the future Telvanni want!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

At least if the Telvanni got their way I'd be able to levitate up to my crates! (I just realized, I may TCL to use the crates because there isn't a good alternative built into the game systems.)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Yeah, outposts seemed to me to be the thing that Starfield was designed and marketed around, but it's so jank. So many basic things missing and so many quality of life failures. It's like they didn't even test it themselves first.