this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
521 points (97.1% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

55085 readers
284 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Musixmatch has a free, public database where lyrics are displayed. To contribute to the database, users can sign up and contribute lyrics, synchronizations, translations, and structuring to get points and move up levels. Musixmatch's points have no redeemable value, but are instead a marker of a particular user's contributions.

So no?

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You as an individual can go access the public free database. Spotify as a corporation is a customer of musixmatch.

https://about.musixmatch.com/business/customer-stories/Spotify

I'm not sure what exactly you're trying to say?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Spotify is receiving money for something they did not create.

Neither the writers of the lyrics nor the fans who transcribed them get a cut.

That is fucked up.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is fucked up that the fans who are transcribing do not get a cut, but it's not like they were misled to believe they would make a cut before they started doing it. The people doing that are doing it out of a passion for the music.

I'm not saying they shouldn't be paid of course they should, if it was up to me I'd say make them all rich. I just think it's a stretch to imply that Spotify is stealing anything here

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I like stealing. According to my belief system theft is good.

It's the fact Spotify is charging users for something stolen is what I think is fucked.
Something stolen should be freely shared.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The writers almost certainly do get a cut. Musixmatch does not own the copyright to any of the lyrics, and as such, negotiated with the copyright holders in order to be allowed to store, display, and sell access to the lyrics. This almost certainly involved some amount of money changing hands.

Spotify is paying money for access to the lyrics and using that as a feature in their product. A chunk of that money is almost certainly going back to the actual writers.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Spotify is receiving money for something they did not create.

Spotify are paying musixmatch for the lyrics.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spotify are paying musixmatch for the lyrics.

musixmatch didn't create the content either.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Irrelevant. It’s up to musixmatch to pay the creators or supplier of their content, not Spotify.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah, the buygamekeys .ru approach.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s not up to Spotify to pay the wages of the company that provides a paid service to them.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just to sell stolen goods, huh?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stolen? Who stole the lyrics?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Anyone extracting rents on gatekeeping access to them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No one is gathering access to lyrics.

Who “stole“ something here, and from who?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one is gathering access to lyrics.

I never said they were. The verb I used was gatekeeping.

You know, like how Spotify locks access to them behind a paywall. The exact thing I just described.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Autocorrect sorry, supposed to be gate keeping.

Spotify isn’t gate keeping access to the lyrics - you’re free to look them up on musixmatch or any of the other lyric sites and services. They’ve simply added them to their subscription services. You don’t know what gate keeping means.

You also still haven’t answer how anyone “stole” anything? Who stole what and from who?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Spotify isn’t gate keeping access to the lyrics

"If you pay us, you can see this. If you don't, you cannot see it."

Now who doesn't know what gatekeeping is?

You also still haven’t answer how anyone “stole” anything?

I have. Multiple times.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So every product on the market is gate keeping?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is freely copyable information no one who is profiting from wrote or transcribed a product?
It's rent-seeking and it's gross.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Spotify don’t just sell lyrics lol. The lyrics are just another of the features that require premium.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right. They gatekeep them behind a paywall. This is like the forth time we've been over this.

They are engaged in rentseeking behavior and that is wrong.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"rentseeking behaviour" is one of the dumbest things I've ever heard used to describe a subscription service.

Is that all this is - you dislike subscription services?

They can't gatekeep something that is available freely and easily outside of their service. They're putting their implementation of the lyrics being matched to the music inside their subscription service. That's not "gatekeeping".

You still haven't explained how anyone "stole" anything either.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They can’t gatekeep something that is available freely and easily outside of their service.

Can you see what they are there if you don't pay them? Do I need to explain a 6th time what gatekeeping is?

You still haven’t explained how anyone “stole” anything either.

Yes I have. You just keep ignoring everything I say.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes I have. You just keep ignoring everything I say.

You haven't, so do it in reply to this. Who stole what from who?

Do I need to explain a 6th time what gatekeeping is?

I think you need someone to explain what it is to you tbh lol. Like I said, is this just you thinking that all subscription services are bad and "gate keeping"? Do you think needing to buy a ticket to go to a theme park is "gatekeeping"?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What part of gatekeeping access are you not able to wrap your head around and how many times do I need to explain profiting off uncompensated labor?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who is profiting off uncompensated labor? Who stole what from who? You keep dodging the questions lol.

Spotify pay Musixmatch for lyrics. Spotify are paying for a service. If Musixmatch are "stealing" lyrics from somewhere that's not Spotify's problem.

Do you just believe that ALL subscriptions and payments to access something are "gatekeeping" behaviour? Answer the question. Is a movie theatre requiring you to buy a ticket before you can see the movie "gatekeeping" and bad? Is having to pay to watch netflix "gatekeeping"?

This is getting unbelievable in how much you are dancing around answering any questions about your crazy train of thought.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And how do you think axes get sharpened?

Whetstones! And you can't just smash a bat into a berry barn.
The edge is what gives axes ...pardon the expression... edge!

So if the gravy thickens what are you going to do with that apretrieaour of yours?

I hope you got some long-term strategy for weevils.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So you're ...... not........ going to answer the simple questions?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then you gotta talk about giant squids.

Them things is huuuuuuuuuuge. Like you can fit two regular size squids inside one and the big ones at that.

All wriggly and covered in equal parts suckers and slime.

Life is like that, my friend. You got all sorts of movement in it and it's trying to slip away from you AS (get is? as) it grips onto you.

Them suckers is painful too, because they got fish hooks in them. Squid fish hooks are natures fish hooks, that's why they used to use them as fish hooks.

Of course they had to catch the squid to cut its arms up and once they managed that no one wanted to use the hooks anymore as they had just went through the trouble of inventing a non-hook-related method of catching sealife.

And life is like that, friend.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

And that's ANOTHER thing. You never cleaned the cheesewheel from the hampster aerdrion valtrex.

Why won't you address the cruise boat missive ?

Right, your moral cowardice.