Asklemmy

43970 readers

839 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

Open-ended question
Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

Lemmyverse: community search
sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
[email protected]: a community for finding communities

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

110

Is there a collection of all human knowledge ever created ? (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

71 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Recently I was wandering if there is someone or some group preserving , collecting , organizing and publishing all the knowledge of mankind ever created throughout its existence so that if ever mankind faces the 6th mass extinction we don't have to reinvent the wheel and can have a kick start to our new post apocalyptic civilization .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wikipedia is absolutely not useless without the sources. I don’t even know what to say, that statement is so deranged.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

WP as it is is of course not useless. But don't confuse it with a real library. Then, imagine in the apocalyptical worst case, having archived only that summary of humankind's knowledge. There's a vast amount of detail that WP is just not the right place for.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Well, sure, of course it leaves a lot of material out. But you'd start with Wikipedia surely, then move onto the source material. If Wikipedia leaves out a lot of material, any one of its sources leaves out a lot more.