Gaming

19549 readers

254 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

555

Bethesda says most of Starfield's 1000+ planets are dull on purpose because 'when the astronauts went to the moon, there was nothing there' but 'they certainly weren't bored' (www.pcgamer.com)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

238 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Sure Todd, lol

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Some do, but they make it their main draw. The reason Kerbal Space Program is fun, is fun because you can fuck up and die in a million different ways, and not doing so is chalenging and succes is rewarding while failure is hilarious(ly frustrating).

Not fucking up and dying in Starfield means pressing the Use Healthpack frequently enough.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

for now, the gameplay-enrichment mods are well on their way

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Imagine a realistic KSP with AAA graphics, like replicating historic missions and planned ones, etc.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

You just described the KSP RP-1 modpack with high graphics and volumetric clouds mod