this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
1024 points (84.9% liked)

Firefox

17955 readers
293 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I use Brave as a second browser (mainly to separate different activities) and did not have any issues with it apart from dragging tabs between monitors (it creates an additional empty tab sometimes when doing this). Turned off all unnecessary stuff right when I first launched it and that's it. No bloat, no issues, just works. Didn't know about this CEO controversy but seeing as it was a long time ago, don't think it's a valid reason to not use Brave. And both logo and name are cool.
It's a solid option which we don't really have a lot of in open source space

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

mainly to separate different activities

Firefox has profiles AND container tabs for exactly this though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, there's simply just Firefox. Which is apparently not the basis for Brave. It does sound like Brave collects data so it still seems shady.

Edit: could have sworn brave was built on Firefox. It's not. It's chromium. Which in my opinion counts against it as I'd rather avoid a monopoly considering how much control Google has over chromium and the inherent biases Google has.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I use it for streaming because the ad block works on spotify and YouTube. I could never get spotify working on Firefox consistently.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago