politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
This is an ongoing example of why conservatives are the enemy. They are actively trying to destroy any form of democratic and people controlled process.
This is not and has never been a "both sides are bad" situation. And anyone trying to argue as such is just as bad as the conservatives.
Yeah; I feel like people need to recognize that
!=
There is one party that is actively unraveling our democracy and it's not the Democrats. I don't have to love them to realize that they are the better choice. And even then, I'd say the Democrats are "good-ish," and many are trying to be good. They're just not great. ¯\(ツ)/¯
During the 1940s, and particularly during WWII, the US was extremely discriminatory (to the point of outright murderous) to black people and rounded up anyone of Japanese descent and put them in camps (often while white people took over their old areas they'd carved out for themselves). They were awful to gays as well.
But you know what the US didn't do? Murder millions of their own citizens in an organized genocide, stripping them of their humanity before killing them en masse in gas chambers.
But nobody (sane) "two-sides" WWII. The US wasn't good, but it was definitely on the right side of that fight, and the fascists needed to be stopped. If we waited for some "good" country to stop the Axis, because we didn't want to support the US, the fascists would have won.
The saying goes "the perfect is the enemy of the good," but sometimes the Good is the enemy of stopping goddamn fascists.
The way you phrased the last sentence makes it seem like you think the phrase "perfect is the enemy of good" means that perfect is better than good, which while true isn't the point of that phrase.
I'm assuming you wrote it that way for dramatic effect, but I wrote this comment for today's 10,000
P.S. can someone calculate what that number would be for the global population, as the 10,000 is for the US
The phrasing was intentional, and symmetrical. The point of the phrase is if you are holding out for the perfect, you'll fail to even get the good. And if you are holding out for a "good" politician (e.g. refusing to vote because your particular chosen politician isn't in the race), you'll fail to keep fascists away from power.
Yeah but Biden couldn't cancel my student loans so I'm voting for the other guy this time
/s in case it wasn't obvious