this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
1044 points (96.3% liked)
Thanks! I hate it!
582 readers
2 users here now
1. Post title must start with "Thanks, I hate..." or "TIH"
-
The naming scheme must start with "Thanks, I hate ...".
-
Posts that don't begin with this will be removed.
-
Please be a little bit more creative than just using "Thanks, I hate it."
2. Reposts should be avoided
3. No extreme NSFW-Posts
-
We don't want to embrace content that is not safe for life.
-
Please tag mildly NSFW-posts with the appropriate tag.
4. No Memes
- Posts shouldn't be memes or content that belongs on c/funny
5. No Low-Quality-Content
-
Content should be somewhat original or good in terms of quality.
-
Low-effort or low-quality content will be removed. This includes screenshots.
-
Most AI generated content is also considered low quality.
6. No Spam
- Posts/comments trying to sell anything, posts/comments linking to social media, or any account carrying out actions that could be interpreted as spam, fall under this rule.
7. Keep comments civil; no bigotry
- No namecalling, personal attacks or bigotry such as sexism, homophobia, transphobia, racism, etc.
8. No Politics
- Posts containing politics are not allowed.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
The principle of minimum wage is that no matter what work you do you're guaranteed to make that as a minimum. If kids weren't there to do these tasks because they weren't allowed to work, then older people paid at least the minimum wage would be doing them. I can also guarantee you that there are adults getting paid a lot more to do a lot less than these kids are, so your "low responsibility and apprentice role" excuse is just crap.
You're defending the system exploiting kids, I hope you realise that.
Am I talking to ChatGPT right now? I really hope so otherwise I’m talking to some idiotic people.
Who's the idiot exactly? The person saying child exploitation must end or the person defending it?
🤔
Look up the definition of child labour. You’re arguing a point you don’t even understand.
It is child labour IF:
• The child is under the age of 11.
• It deprives the child of their childhood.
• It interferes with education of ability to attend school.
• It causes moral, physical, or emotional harm.
None of these things are breached by any country adhering to the child labour treaty applied by the U.N, which SANCTIONS children working before they are adults but no younger than 11.
Honestly, I’m done with you. You’re too stupid to talk to. Go and read your Bible or draw anime or whatever people like you do on a weekend.
"It is child labour IF:
• The child is under the age of 11.
• It deprives the child of their childhood.
• It interferes with education of ability to attend school.
• It causes moral, physical, or emotional harm."
Funny because you're the one who mentioned ILO and then you made up a definition that doesn't match theirs. But I guess I'm the one who's stupid 🤔
https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-yangon/documents/publication/wcms_531953.pdf
https://www.ilo.org/ipec/facts/lang--en/index.htm
https://www.ilo.org/moscow/areas-of-work/child-labour/WCMS_249004/lang--en/index.htm
No mention of age anywhere.
Working 20h/week is harmful to schooling:
https://www.washington.edu/news/2011/02/09/working-more-than-20-hours-a-week-in-high-school-can-harm-grades-uw-researcher-finds/#:~:text=But%20students%20who%20began%20working,to%20their%20non%2Dworking%20peers.
I know, it's hard to admit that we're wrong 😟 It's also very funny how you didn't answer to the reply with a bunch of links that contradict you...