Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54698 readers

388 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others

Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

💰 Please help cover server costs.


Ko-fi	Liberapay

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Having a hard time settling on a VPN (lemm.ee)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

40 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I torrent (on the same PC that I run a Plex server from), but also auto connect on my devices whenever I’m on public wifi, so speed and avoiding blocks/captchas is also important. From what I understand having port forwarding will make a big difference in my torrent transfer speeds and ability to connect to peers.

I’m currently using Nord, but I’d like to make the switch to a company with a better privacy track record. I’m still really drawn to PIA because of the speeds and port forwarding, but I know their ownership is pretty sketchy, even if there’s nothing to point to there (yet). Mullvad dropped port forwarding, which seems to leave ProtonVPN. But now I’m hearing that the influx of Russian users post-invasion has increased the number of sites and services that block PVPN servers?

It seems like despite the huge amount of choices, nothing checks all the boxes except PIA. Am I missing something, or misinformed?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No.

My (possibly mistaken) understanding is that during the download phase your client is contacting seeds requesting parts. Although the data is going to be incoming it's still an outbound connection because your client initiated it, so you don't need to be connectable for that.

It's the seeding phase which is problematic because downloaders can't contact you to request parts. That said your client will still contact downloaders and offer parts, which again is an outbound connection so you don't need to be contactable.

In summary download speeds are uneffected, but seeding rates will be diminished. With most private trackers you can still satisfy seeding requirements just by keeping the torrent available for however long.

As an aside I use mullvad & wireguard. I've found wireguard dramatically easier to configure, particularly in a docker environment.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m not on any private trackers. I’d be interested, but not until I have a more dedicated setup; I’m still very much a casual torrenter.

It’s good news then if port forwarding won’t affect my downloads, because that was the only reason I wanted it, but I saw others online say that lacking that feature is what was causing me not to connect to peers shown in my torrent client. Any idea what’s up with that?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Any idea what’s up with that?

Not really. Either my explanation is wrong or theirs is. Honestly could be either.

There's so much misunderstanding and misinformation around torrenting.

All I know is that I've never had any problems downloading without being connectable. Never ever. It's just not an issue.

Additionally, the vast majority of people torrenting in 2023 are using a vpn and none (very few) of them will forward ports so it can't be a big deal.

Thirdly, there's a lot of piracy purists / elitists who just can't abide the idea that your set up may not have the best possible configuration for seeding. IMO, seeding on a residential connection is just a waste of time - download on a residential connection, seed on a VPS / seedbox.