this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
12 points (92.9% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

5234 readers
1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think it's time to have a conversation about the massive amount of hidden waste created by the likes of Amazon through free returns.

From TFA:

"In 2022, returns cost retailers about $816 billion in lost sales. That’s nearly as much as the U.S. spent on public schools and almost twice the cost of returns in 2020. The return process, with transportation and packaging, also generated about 24 million metric tons of planet-warming carbon dioxide emissions in 2022.

"UPS transports those items to the retailer’s warehouses dedicated to processing returns. This step of the process costs the retailer money – 66% of the cost of a $50 item by one estimate – and emits carbon dioxide as trucks and planes carry items hundreds of miles. The plastic, paper or cardboard from the return package becomes waste.

"In 2019, about 5 billion pounds of waste from returns were sent to landfills, according to an estimate by the return technology platform Optoro. By 2022, the estimated waste had nearly doubled to about 9.5 billion pounds."

For those of us in the metric world, 9.5 billion pounds is around 4.3 billion kilograms.

https://fortune.com/2023/06/14/amazon-returns-ecommerce-how-bad-big-problem-816-billion/

@green #sustainability @[email protected] @[email protected] #CircularEconomy #Waste #Business #Economics #Recycling #Environment

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think this is more about direct to consumer shipping. If it's shipped first to businesses, consumers can return it directly there