Warhammer 40k

3965 readers

24 users here now

A community dedicated to the universe of Warhammer 40k, a tabletop setting in the far, distant future.

This is a general community for 40k miniatures, art, lore discussion, and gameplay discussion.

Rules

Keep it civil.
No memeposts/shitposts. Memes are great but direct them to grimdank.
Please mark any posts containing realistic nudity or realistic excessive gore/violence as NSFW; this rule mainly applies to cosplay and realistic drawings rather than miniatures. Being that 40k is inherently violent, this is a judgement call, and mods may occasionally request posters add tags.
No political or social cause agenda pushing.

Helpful Links

Related 40K Communities:

[email protected]

Other tabletop hobby communities:

[email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

So everyone's playing house rules points per model right? (self.warhammer40k)

submitted 2 years ago by julietOscarEcho to c/[email protected]

24 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I don't love free wargear (because there will inevitably better or worse options when everything is a straight swap whereas with points cost you can balance finely), but I can see that it makes life easier.

Fixed unit sizes, however, are supremely shit. All in all totally ripped the variety out of list building, which was one of my favourite things about the game. Lists now will look mostly identical.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

If a gear option was just objectively better, people would talk about the unit as though they were the cost with the equipment. It allows for lists that aren't being taxed to death for funtional choices. Also I feel like the wide varieties of strength makes it less "this one is objectively better" and more "this one is objectively better against tanks" but we'll see as the games get played and the tournaments battle reports get posted