this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
320 points (99.1% liked)

Canada

7236 readers
459 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Two years after ValΓ©rie Plante's administration said a new housing bylaw would lead to the construction of 600 new social housing units per year, the city hasn't seen a single one.

The Bylaw for a Diverse Metropolis forces developers to include social, family and, in some places, affordable housing units to any new projects larger than 4,843 square feet.

If they don't, they must pay a fine or hand over land, buildings or individual units for the city to turn into affordable or social housing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Housing really is one of those aspects of the market that needs to be demonetized and handled by governments.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

it is too late, it is already become rich people gold mine/golden egg that they wont let go no matter what because how stable the investment is, not to mention not taxable when empty

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

And then what? They would protest?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree in principle, though I have a hard time seeing it going any other way than real estate developers getting even richer because now they just need to ~~bribe~~ lobby whatever politician is in charge of it for all the best deals

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean nationalize the industry so no one makes money. Only government constructs housing. All real estate development firms are nationalized and taken over by government, all equipment seized, all construction workers now under employ of the government.

It might be the only real way to solve the problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Given a significant portion of politicians own investment and rental properties, I'd be nervous about how well they would actually handle owning all the housing supply. I think there are corruption issues and policies to protect the public needed before the government should own significant amounts of housing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

AKA we need a new government and to annihilate the ruling class

It will be impossible to have any functional system until the dysfunctional humans are removed from play.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We already got that. Municipal governments have control of the housing market. It's called "zoning" and their opinion on housing is "no."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Then buy a bunch of land and incorporate it as a separate county. Or the Canadian equivalent, I don't know what you guys call it

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Would the government have the power to force people to move?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

πŸ€” I don't think it would have to come to that. They could very well leave anyone who's already there where they are, survey the neighborhood or otherwise figure out who's renting and who's not, turn over ownership to whoever's renting, and seize all empty housing to distribute to individuals or families looking for a primary residence. It actually would be possible to do it humanely.