this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
166 points (97.7% liked)
/kbin meta
110 readers
1 users here now
Magazine dedicated to discussions about the kbin itself. Provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics. ---- * Roadmap 2023 * m/kbinDevlog * m/kbinDesign
founded 1 year ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
HARD DISAGREE
Another community having the possibility of posting something you don’t approve of when nothing is actually illegal, nobody is actually getting hurt, and you could just have blocked that community (or even just offending users) for yourself in the first place is just a really dumb reason to force the whole instance to defederate from it.
It’s up to Ernest what happens, but I’m not on board for unnecessary censorship of cartoons, of all things. I honestly worry for you.
It is actually illegal in some jurisdictions, including mine.
It probably is illegal in some jurisdictions, that's the issue.
Said by every loli loving paedo.
It is 100% illegal in my jurisdiction. Any drawn, statue, or other depiction of someone with the appearance of a minor in a sexual manner, regardless of stated age, is treated as child pornography, with similar laws in most major countries I believe. People really need to stop assuming things aren't illegal just because they think it shouldn't be. The country that the admin of Kbin is on also views it as illegal, and he is bound to enforce that on Kbin.social.
Regardless of the legality, I don't care if it's a 1,000 year old dragon. If it looks like a 10 year old, it's a 10 year old, regardless of how much deflection people do. And if someone likes a 10 year old cartoon girl, guess what they also like?
People have absolutely 0 ground to stand on trying to defend this.
Edit: Although the situation with LemmyNSFW was a miswording on their part, I stand by what I said overall
I agree