this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
54 points (88.6% liked)

Reddit Migration

670 readers
1 users here now

### About Community Tracking and helping #redditmigration to Kbin and the Fediverse. Say hello to the decentralized and open future. To see latest reeddit blackout info, see here: https://reddark.untone.uk/

founded 1 year ago
 

SEE SECOND EDIT DOWN BELOW

Lets not beat around the bush here, lots of people like to look at boobs and dicks.

Lemmynsfw was looking like a good place to go, but reading the "Loli" announcement thread where they equate drawn child porn to petite women, its clear the owner is not the right person to be hosting a NSFW instance for the majority of people.

Is there anywhere else that people can recommend?

There is undoubtably a need for such an instance. Can we discuss this like adults?

edit: UPDATE

Take this update as you will

I'm taking it as a backtrack, but it's still not an instance I want to associate with.

Lots of people keen to offer their opinion of drawn picture of naked kids, haven't seen any alternatives though

Edit 2: At this point I think their updated rules are good. It took a bit to get there, but in the end they appear to be taking a hard stance. Hopefully this is enforced.

I dont think it was a case of "whoops bad English" like they are suggesting, I think it was a total 180 backflip. This doesnt really instill confidence in the admins IMO, but im happy that they have made the right decision in regards to allowed content. Hopefully this is was just some early wobblies and the community can move on.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lolli is a very stretchable word you can technically see a 18 year old flat chested, short woman as lolli

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

loli/shota haters are gonna lose their shit when they find out about oppai loli. if loli referred to minors, such a thing simply couldn't exist lol.

the reality is that loli/shota have nothing to do with age.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

uzuki-chan XD strictly speaking lolli...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yup. people hating on this clearly ave no idea what they're talking about. like there's a clear distinction between actual anime children and loli content. and there's plenty of people who like the latter and not the former. it's not hard to understand.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lolicon does depict minor characters engaged in sexual acts. Whether that is exclusively or not doesn’t really matter. Although it doesn’t surprise me to see you here defending it. You have trash fucking takes on every topic you engage in.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

the cool thing about the fediverse and open platforms is that we are free to agree to disagree. the second you start defederating, silencing, or banning people over disagreements, is the second you start building an echochamber and leading to situations like what reddit or twitter have. If you don't like the stuff I comment or share, then you're free to block me.

But why does your dislike of what I wish to discuss/say/share mean that I shouldn't be allowed to do so and discuss with others who do wish to speak to me?