this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
45 points (82.6% liked)

Women

772 readers
1 users here now

A place for discussion, camaraderie, and advice.

For, from, and with women. Hi πŸ‘‹

RULES:

--Be good to one another.

If you're not sure about what you're about to type, ask yourself: Is it true? Is it kind? Is it necessary?

--About, but not only for, women.

We are here to talk about, learn about, and wonder about women and their/our experiences. Men are allowed to post here, but only for the purpose of asking sincere questions about women or for advice related to a women in their lives they are trying to support.

--No bullies. No Creeps. No trolls.

No personal attacks, no misogyny, no misandry, ageism, racism, or otherwise hateful or disrespectful commentary.

--No selling products or services.

You can recommend products/methods that work for you, but soliciting clients or patients is not allowed. No advertising or self-promotions, including using this sub to drive traffic elsewhere.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The International Chess Federation (FIDE) says it is temporarily banning transgender women from competing in its women's events.

The FIDE said individual cases would require "further analysis" and that a decision could take up to two years.

The move has been criticised by some players and enthusiasts.

Many sports governing bodies have been working on policies towards transgender athletes, but chess does not involve comparable levels of physical activity.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019188691400261X

There are five more replicating too. You know, you're allowed to brush up on topics BEFORE you begin pontificating.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Where is the part that says that women should be segregated from men?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think expecting someone like them to be reading up on scientific literature is a bit much.

Either you’re the type to understand that this issue is complex and requires some thought, or you think you already know everything.

Just as there are people who think Donald Trump have all the answers, why do we expect everybody on the internet to be capable of rational thought?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Hope springs eternal, lol. I dunno. Thanks for the words.