804
submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

It uncovered eight WHO panelists involved with assessing safe levels of aspartame consumption who are beverage industry consultants who currently or previously worked with the alleged Coke front group, International Life Sciences Institute (Ilsi).

Their involvement in developing intake guidelines represents “an obvious conflict of interest”, said Gary Ruskin, US Right-To-Know’s executive director. “Because of this conflict of interest, [the daily intake] conclusions about aspartame are not credible, and the public should not rely on them,” he added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 174 points 11 months ago

We've studied this chemical literally more than any other food additive and there's still nothing definitive. Also mice are not a good stand-in for humans. They are really only used for acute toxicity and such.

[-] Tb0n3 64 points 11 months ago

But the mice genetically predisposed to getting tumors got tumors. What more proof do you need?

[-] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago

It's official: Cancer causes cancer.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

One step closer cancer causing mice

[-] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Fun fact. A potential side effect of many cancer treatments is... cancer

[-] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

just gotta hope it kills the old cancer before it gives you a new cancer

[-] [email protected] -5 points 11 months ago

How hecking cancerous cancer is?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago
load more comments (19 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
804 points (96.1% liked)

World News

31537 readers
446 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS