this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
107 points (91.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43956 readers
966 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_[email protected]~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I do believe the biggest impact would come from regulating large companies and billionaires, but it’s not one or the other.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Anytime you have a chance to vote, take it, and vote for whatever option will be most likely to reduce the overall emissions. In most cases, this will probably mean voting for programs/parties etc that oppose conservatism.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh imagine a majority of people consistently doing that. We could go somewhere with our efforts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

In the US, neither party is serious about stopping climate change. They are both controlled by big oil, big car, etc.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There is ideological diversity within the democratic party, especially at the local level. As part of a representative democracy, the electorate needs to be engaged with their representatives. You should start looking closely at your most local representatives.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree the the democrats are not nearly serious enough about stopping climate change, but the republican party is actively hindering efforts and definitely worse for the plant in the long run.
Neither party being serious does not mean one isn't way worse than the other

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You still need to hold the Dems feet to the fire. Just handing them your vote as the least worst option just means you'll never be offered any good options. Make them work for it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And what do you mean by that? What specific actions are you talking about?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can get involved in protests to try to make them pay attention. You can write letters to your representatives and prospective candidates. You can ask good questions at town halls. You can campaign for good candidates.

Voting is the least important thing you can do. Ultimately you have no choice but to vote for the least worst option but if that's the only thing you ever do, you're helping to bury all of us.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Can't disagree with that