this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
434 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

59581 readers
3293 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Achird 91 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not surprising. I used to update every 2 years but my last couple have had a 3 or 4 year gap.

As it should be really. These can be very expensive devices that only make sense if you get a decent life out of them.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I just don’t see the point of upgrading every two years, and even if I did I’m buying used at this point.

I’m on iPhone and despite all the fanatics creaming their pants over each release, very little actually seems to change.

I know a guy with a 6 year old phone, and when he listed off the features it made me realise how little things have actually changed since it was released.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I have an iPhone 8 and see no reason to update in the near future.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Reading this on iPhone X

[–] penguin 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When smartphones first took off, each new one was a large upgrade. But each passing year sees new phones being more and more iterative. There's hardly any difference at all anymore between individual years.

I'm at the point now where I keep my phones until they break or stop getting security updates.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When smartphones first took off, each new one was a large upgrade

And they were subsidized by the cell phone company, so they only cost $200 (In many places in the US, at least).

[–] Achird 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah definitely this is a big factor.

I have a small pot I save into for my phone upgrade each month. Waiting longer means I get a shiner new phone when I do finally decide to upgrade.

And once I have it I want it to last as long as possible!

When it used to be just part of your contract you wouldn’t think about, just get a new one when your contract said it was time.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

There wasn't even a maximum on the contract. When I got my first two phones, I agreed to a 2-year cellular contract. If I closed my account or moved providers before that, I had to pay AT&T some amount of money to kill the contract. After those two years were up, I could do whatever I wanted. I was then on a month-to-month payment, like standard cell plans today. They just wanted to make sure to recoup their money over 2 years for subsidizing my cheaper phone upfront.

Now, the subsidization is more like a subscription fee, where there are additional fees on the bill each month toward the phone and the cell phone company encourages you to get a new one once it's paid off. You're still paying full price for a phone. Possibly forever.