this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
510 points (93.8% liked)

World News

32390 readers
744 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What the fuck are you talking about this is at the top of /all/ and it's about a socialist country, of course socialists are here.

Feel free to point to the "brigade" organisation that exists, it's a figment of your imagination. Nobody is brigading anything by simply using the fucking site. Are you brigading by being here too then?

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

brigading is when I get ratioed, and the more ratioed I am the more brigading it is

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

I've got 3 fucking years of practice posting nonsensical shit in megathreads and I'm just now starting to feel the power this has in threads like this one.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Keep pretending China is socialist.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Keep pretending it isn't, lib.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You're the only liberal here for kissing a capitalist nation's ass.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hey, coward, explain how you can simultaneously believe that the Donbas is independent and that when Russian troops entered their territory at their request that constituted an invasion.

Explain or admit that you don't consistently believe in self determination.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When did I say I'm against Russian troops entering Donbas territory? I made it very clear I'm against Russian troops entering anywhere BUT Donbas. Love how you guys claim to be anti-war until the millisecond a non-western nation is the one committing war crime atrocities and mass murdering civilians.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly I wouldn't even much of a problem if they just invaded Donbas

How could they possibly invade the Donbas at all when they were invited?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Semantics. I didn't mean "invade," that was just the word that came in my head. You know damn well what I meant.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It came into your head for a reason, liar. I guess going forward, nobody should assume that you mean what you say.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're just gonna ignore the fact I said and have been saying I supported it huh? Fucking Russia lovers with no understanding of nuance

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

if person.beliefs != NatoPropaganda:

person.status = RussiaLover

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Erm...

if person.beliefs != RussianPropaganda:

person.status = NATOLover

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Im actually surprised that you could read the runes, interesting.

However I never said that you loved NATO lmao you just uncritically consume *and parrot their propaganda about Russia being le big evil in this situation.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (10 children)

If I said that I supported people's rights to sell marijuana and I didn't even think they should get much jail time for it, people would rightly point out that I was lying about my support.

You stated that you supported self determination for people in the Donbas, and I didn't ignore it at all, I'm saying that even within the same post you proved that you actually didn't when you referred to their allies entering their territory as an invasion.

Again, I'm not ignoring anything, I just think you're a liar and that you only started pretending to support the Donbas's self determination because doing otherwise would undermine the point you were trying to make about Taiwan.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

bro even wikipedia acknowledges china is socialist lmao

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Socialist Market Economy is a socialist mode of production. :bean:

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right, and the sky is green too.

Adding the word "socialist" in front of "market economy" doesn't make it any less capitalist. I'm done with this.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

nuh uh because it means that the CPC has final say over shit with regards to the economy and governance instead of just leaving things up to the market like a true capitalist country

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's called state capitalism wise guy.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

State capitalism is when you execute billionaires and enact compulsory planning for key parts of the nation's development such as health and infrastructure.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No but state capitalism is when the majority of billionaires are allowed to exist in the first place dumbass. Tight regulations don't make you socialist. And putting money into health and infrastructure is possible under capitalism LMFAO

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

majority of billionaires are allowed to exist in the first place dumbass

Socialism is a transitory stage between capitalism and communism where there is ongoing class warfare between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat my dude. In China, the state is on the side of the proletariat, not the bourgeois.

And putting money into health and infrastructure is possible under capitalism

And yet China is the only major power where the state has a tight grip on both... Interesting!

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

In China, the state is on the side of the proletariat, not the bourgeois

THEN BAN BILLIONAIRES AND STOP FOLLOWING DENG'S CAPITALISM JFC. Not that hard if they were actually socialist and aiming for communism.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Not that hard if they were actually socialist

So why haven't you done it yet?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

wojak-nooo : NOOOO!!! WHY HAVENT YOU PRESSED THE COMMUNISM BUTTON XI?! NOOO!!!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

“[Capitalists] act as if they are being chased by a bear,” wrote Zhang Lin, a Beijing political commentator, in response to these comments. “They are powerless to control the bear, so they are competing to outrun each other to escape the animal.”

og-hex-bear

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Maybe say something of your own instead of linking a wall text. Does it look like I wanna read 5 pages of CCP propaganda?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol 5 pages 😂🫴📖

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

"Red Sails is a website run by Roderic Day in collaboration with Nia Frome, Sobrina de Alguien, and several other comrades."

Inb4 "muh CCP paid shills!!!!"

That would be going into the realm of conspiracy theories lmao

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

All of the billionaires allowed to exist under your socialist project, so you're not really in a position to judge.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cool then let’s have the CPC run the USA, I’m sure you’re okay with that since China is actually capitalist, right? It should totally be the same here if the CPC takes control, right? Right?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

The kingdom of your God is not socialist, it is a monarchy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Keep pretending Catholicism has anything to do with socialism.