this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
53 points (96.5% liked)

UAP - The Most Active Community Discussing UAP/UFOs

1274 readers
1 users here now

A community for civil discourse related to Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. Share your sightings, experiences, news, and investigations. Everyone is welcome here, from believers to skeptics and everything in between.


New to Lemmy?

See the Getting Started Guide


Want Disclosure?

Declassify UAP offers a tool that automatically finds your representatives and sends them a prewritten message.


Community Spotlight

Featured Posts and User Investigations


Useful Links


Community Rules


Other Communities

[email protected]


If you're interested in moderating or have any suggestions for the community, feel free to contact SignullGone or HM05_Me.


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He does casually brush it off, and money isn't a scientific reason to dismiss anything. I'm skeptical too, but this was a terrible approach.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Money represents effort and resources, so while it is worded flippant it is a valid point that we shouldn't assume interplanetary flight is just a weekend away for aliens.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We don't know the conditions on that theoretical alien world. They could be post-scarcity, or alternatively, they could be threatened to the extent that no cost is too high.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

He is saying there is no reason to assume they have reached that point just to explain something that is most likely a misunderstanding of something mundane.