this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
1153 points (97.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

7888 readers
3340 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 169 points 6 days ago (32 children)

Modern UI designers don’t have a fucking clue.

You’d think the first principle would be “don’t break the existing fucking UI”, but no.

Infinite scroll. Windows without toolbars. Replacing context menu with useless site-specific one. Forcing links to open in new or same tab, depriving the user of choice. Blocking text select. Blocking copy, as if that’s somehow going to stop people from stealing your shitty content. Fucking with the browser history.

And then there’s the constant reinventing of the wheel. How many times do we need to implement a fucking checkbox?

No lie, I’ve actually had designers come to me with a concept for “a visual indicator that shows the user how they are progressing through the page”.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (7 children)

What's wrong with infinite scroll?

[–] [email protected] 58 points 6 days ago (1 children)

As it's most often seen on news sites - where scrolling too far gives you another article - a handful of reasons.

One: there are frequently still links (think "about us" / "contact us" kind of pages) in the footer that you might need to access, which you can invariably now never reach, because as soon as they're in view they're replaced by more content.

Two: as the parent poster so accurately put it, "fucking with the browser history". It becomes entirely indeterminate whether the back button now returns to the previous site, or just goes back by one piece of content.

Three: the new content is almost certainly unrelated to the page I started on, and not of any interest to me.

[–] tja 24 points 6 days ago

This was just happening to me with Amazon. I wanted to get to the support link in the footer but they always loaded new stuff before I could click on it

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (29 replies)