this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
99 points (94.6% liked)
Open Source
36997 readers
59 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
They chose it because it's often the only way they can distribute packages to Ubuntu users. Which was the whole point all along; Canonical taking control of app distribution.
But why choose snap only? Flatpak works on Ubuntu just fine, and on other distros obviously, so they could just choose that. Blender only officially support snap too. Vivaldi for example made a blog post about how snap has better sandboxing of chromium. https://social.vivaldi.net/@ruario/113164179328218870
Because they don’t want to support flatpak.
Well then that has nothing to do with Canonical forcing developers to use snap if they want to appear in the software centre.
Canonical created snap; of course they’re going to push it.
It’d be like if Sony created BluRay and then didn’t do any market/sponsorship/etc.