this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
279 points (97.3% liked)

PC Gaming

11038 readers
637 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

When I fought Nvidia over this "editorial direction" push that they've been pursuing in our call, which I've recorded and I am prepared to release if I have to because Nvidia was also recording those calls and both parties were aware that Nvidia was recording those call because they were calls for the press.

Just to be clear, Nvidia, I am prepared to release them if I need to reinforce my statements today.

But in those calls I repeatedly pointed out that this whole thing of pursuing a certain editorial like pushed narrative; that creates a transparency problem.

  • Steve Burke from Gamers Nexus
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

It usually is, but they're obsessed with promoting new tech.

They wanted them to use MFG 4x and DLSS4 comparisons against cards that don't support that version. They literally wanted them to lie to people who are watching a review and might buy the card. Depending on how it's phrased in communication with different reviewers, some jurisdictions might take notice.