this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
43 points (95.7% liked)

Ask

584 readers
87 users here now

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Posts must be legitimate questions (no rage bait or sea lioning)
  3. No spam
  4. NSFW allowed if tagged
  5. No politics
  6. For support questions, please go to [email protected]

Icon by Hilmy Abiyyu A.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Or you could invest the $100K a year. You have to compare apples to apples.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but the expected return of the $2M is greater than $100k yearly, so you're not really going to be able to get ahead with the $100k/year. Compounding then further tips the scales in favour of the lump sum.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

For sure, assuming that the annual amount isn't indexed to inflation. But the question is just simple math if it isn't. See my longer answer.

Indexed, $100K/yr wins hands down if you're young.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I could live comfortably on a small fraction of that, so it would pile up really fast if I had long to live. Not going to be billionaire money, but easily in the "think about pouring that somewhere good" money.