Australian Politics

1531 readers

15 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Former Greens leaders urge party to stand up to Labor ‘arrogance’ as jockeying begins to replace Bandt (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

They aren't mandated to choose a formal leader (and they didn't have one prior to Bob Brown stepping up in 2005). My guess is that the choice to have a leader is a reflection of their growth as a party. For better or worse, coverage of Australian politics is often based around how the individual leaders of each party are responding to current events. Having an official leader elected by the party room allows The Greens to put someone forward in direct competition with the major parties. Bandt losing his seat made his position as leader untenable, because no one is going to take an unelected leader (particularly one who has lost their seat) seriously. Furthermore, losing his job also likely means he loses the financial ability to be a full time leader, not to mention he is no longer privy to much of the information that would be necessary for him to effectively lead his colleagues in Canberra.