this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
125 points (99.2% liked)

Canada

9677 readers
1012 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There's been a lot of talk about SMR's over the years, it's nice to see one finally being built.

Even if it comes in over budget, getting the first one done will be a great learning experience and could lead to figuring out how to do future ones cheaper.

Assuming it's on time, completion in 2029, connected to grid in 2030.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The small modular reactor (SMR) would provide 300 megawatts of power, enough electricity to supply about 300,000 homes, according to briefing documents from Ontario's Ministry of Energy and Mines.

300MW isn't small at all. That's half a CANDU block! I thought they would be significantly smaller and therefore not too significant for the grid until we build more units. This is the equivalent of 20-30 of the largest wind turbines available. Not sure if we have that large units installed in Canada.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It's small compared to typical nuclear reactors which are usually 1GW, and these new units use much less land space.

Edit: They're also designed to be manufactured offsite at a manufacturing facility instead of the very large ones that are built on site.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Our reactors have lower output than the typical 1-1.5GW of foreign designs though. CANDU are in the the 500-800MW range. It's why compared to CANDU, 300MW is significant.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ah, I didn't realize the CANDU's were also manufactured at a factory unlike the bigger built in place ones.

I guess it's just about getting them even smaller at that point, and the SMRs take up less land space as well.

A SMR-300 (maybe not this one specifically) can be as small as 3 hectares.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't know if CANDUs have pre-made components, I was just talking about their output power. I don't know exactly why it's lower than other designs but I know there are some fundamental differences like CANDU burning unenriched uranium as opposed to almost all other designs. It also uses heavy water to make that possible compared to the rest. I assume the lower power output is related to these differences. Or it could be arbitrary. We need someone working on nukes at OPG or SNC-Lavalin to chime in. 😂

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Oh sorry I googled CANDU to learn a bit more and saw that they were also made in a factory offsite.

I imagine that's at least one of the reasons why its lower capacity per reactor. It can only be so big if built offsite.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So we had SMRs all along? I smell a grift. 😂

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

The CANDU still take a much larger space I guess due to the overall design. You can fit one of these SMRs in 10-15 acres.