this post was submitted on 19 Apr 2025
1401 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

69845 readers
3675 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I feel like it qualifies under

offering a service the value of which entirely or primarily derives from the value of the Program or modified version

Doing it fast is essential and a core part of many services' value, I'm sure.

You have a point regarding the FAQ but I do not see that written in the license. This is a problem that would only be granted in case MongoDB/ElasticSearch/Redis sues someone for internal use and I think that's a borderline risk too much to take.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That wording is pointing to reselling the program or the same functionality. Of course if your service is "fast key based data retrieval" it would violate the definition, but something like "low latency gaming notifications" would not, because the value is gaming notifications, something redis doesn't offer. Same as if your service uses encryption in transit, you're not just reselling openssl.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I know prohibiting reselling is what they probably intended. But that doesn't mean they can't push a different and very valid interpretation when they want to.

you're not just reselling openssl.

The wording—"primarily derives from"—is much broader than "just". I believe that Resque's dependence on Redis is enough to satisfy "primarily".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Well, I don't believe so, but as you said it's ultimately for a court to test it.