politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Ok but it’s pretty clear that lack of budget is correlated to poor education. You have to be disconnected from reality to say it isn’t. That sounds like some conservative talking point to me.
I mean someone that has $0 spent on their education is clearly not going to have enough resources to get a reasonable education, but we're not talking about that, so why even try to argue that?
We spend more than any other country, more than our peer countries by about 34%, yet our education system is crap. So my argument, that you can't just throw money at schools and expect them to get better, is factual.
Saying any criticism about government organizations isn't inherently conservative, it's just reality.
Show me a school in a poor area that out performs schools in rich areas.
I think you’re the type that is happy to defund schools because you think it has no impact on education quality. A conservative view point.
You want me to pick two schools in the whole united states to compare their demographics and if the lower income school does better it proves my point?
How bout this, I've shown proof and a source that shows how much we're spending in schools and how much other countries are spending, all provided by the OECD, a very reliable organization.
How about you provide any source showing that with low income schools we don't provide the funding per full time student comparable to other countries, and/or that education proficiency is directly related to spending.
Once again, you're thinking is wrong. I explained to you exactly what the OECD said - that we spend more per FTE than any of our peer countries, and by a substantial amount. Did I say I wanted to defund schools? No, I said that we can't keep throwing money at the system and expect it to be fixed. See this is what you do, you don't have any sources, statistics or any information, you just think any criticism of a government organization is a 'conservative viewpoint' and therefore baseless.
I provided sources to back up my claim, you should do the same or I don't want to waste time on you.
No I’m not wasting my time on someone that thinks defunding education is a good idea. Don’t you have a trump rally to be at?
Hahaha see exactly, I can provide as much information on the topic about how we spend so much money per student in our country, and our peer countries are spending 30% less but having better results, from a reliable, liberal approved OECD.
You're being willingly ignorant, you refuse to accept facts from reliable international organizations because you refuse to acknowledge that the way the left wants to deal with the problem doesn't make sense.
You say 'no we need more funding! Shut up you're wrong, you're saying something that may have some sort of conservative leaning! You hate kids'
You provide no information of why people should believe your stance. What are you doing man? Look into issues and try to understand them before you spout off about shit you don't know. Whenever you talk trash about how the MAGA folk just follow their leader and don't look into issues or understand reliable sources, you're talking trash about yourself, too.
You’re ranting like a clown. As I said I am not wasting my time on someone who thinks defunding education is a brilliant move. Go piss up a rope
Trying to back up your statements with evidence from respectable international organizations.
Come on man, why even try to argue your point if you aren't going to put forth a solid argument? You're rage quitting because you can't back up your false statements.
So other countries have socialized education, and they manage to have better results than our for-profit education system, and that somehow proves that our schools suck and should receive less funding, even though our schools have corporations sucking most of the money out of the system?
What countries are you talking about, and how is our education system for profit?
No, our education system is majorly public, 90% of kids attend public school. Public schools are incredibly well funded, much better than any of our peer countries, yet our system sucks. So yeah, I want to rebuild it, or try different methods, because what the left is doing with the system isn't working.
What are you talking about? Based on the several inaccuracies of your 2 sentence comment, you are either malicious, confused or just incredibly unknowledgeable.
All that money goes to shareholders in the private businesses which are used as contractors in the public school system. Just as with healthcare where Americans pay up to three times as much per capita compared to countries with universal healthcare, it all goes into the pockets of middlemen as profit.
In other comparable countries this doesn't happen because they aren't relying on private contractors, instead they have more money actually going to education than the US.
What private contractors are taking up the school funding? If that's true, sounds like a fundamental problem with our education system, that throwing more money at the problem won't solve.
McGraw Hill, Pearson, Scholastic, Houghton Mifflin, etc...