Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
view the rest of the comments
There is literally nothing about Cachy's construct that would support what you're saying. It's a distro made with tiny tweaks here and there, but nothing that would make a night and day difference the way you're describing.
Would love to get some stats and hard facts about your experience though.
v3 and v4 optimized packages are a big improvement over default arch
10% benchmark difference
free performance for just changing from arch's repos to cachy's? im thinking based.
I didn't find any difference between CachyOS and EndeavourOS on a newer Intel chip. COS was a bit bloated for my likings. Ended up sticking with EOS.
While I don't have much in a way of hard data, it feels much snappier. Also, it seems to utilize less ram. I believe the difference lies in the Cachy's repo. A lot of the apps I use daily are not installable from Manjaro repos and so I had to use flatpaks and AppImages. AUR was also a hit or miss for me. Catchy, on the other hand had most of the apps I use in it's repo. Things like Tutanota desktop client and Zen browser as an example.
Ignore the downer replying to you. If you found something that works well for you, then great!
their default KDE desktop has got animation speeds set to much higher than default values.
Well, friend, I hate to break it to you, but your package experience is going to be every modern distro out there.
You're running an OS that evolves weekly and monthly. Think about who makes software for Windows, and why it's always fucking terrible.
You're running an OS that needs constant attention and builds to make it compatible. It's a lot of work, and I have to say how annoying you are for complaining about free shit that annoys you.
Can't say this is an idea or attitude that happens much in today's world.
I'm not sure where did you get an idea that I was complaining about something. I've been running Linux for over 15 years. I know how to maintain my system. I was simply saying that I found a distro that's better FOR ME than the one I was using.