this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
1321 points (99.1% liked)

People Twitter

6692 readers
766 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

My 50 year old "dumb" doorbell doesn't need to be recharged. More proof that "smart" technology isn't actually smarter and isn't actually making our lives easier.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If they had a 50 year old doorbell they could replace it with a better version of the pictured one that is powered by the old doorbell circuit.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

My Ring doorbell like this does connect to my existing power supply for a 'dumb' doorbell. This version shown is a wireless model aimed more at apartments which don't have existing wiring or for a tenant who wants a removable version to take when they move.

I am not not associated with Ring, just a customer.

[–] prettybunnys 4 points 1 week ago

A doorbell like this requires recharging because it is wireless.

Meaning you don’t need to drill holes, just connect it to your WiFi.

Maybe screw the holder into something (or just command strip it to your door).

It removes to recharge.

Other smart door bells connect to existing power, and don’t need recharging.

[–] Imgonnatrythis 3 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure you know what proof is

[–] slackassassin 2 points 1 week ago

A dumb doorbell won't let me talk to or see anything from the third floor which makes it much easier to tell Jehovah's witnesses to fuck off.