Games

38883 readers

1171 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

Video games

Generic

Gaming: Our sister community, focused on POC and console gaming. Meme are allowed.
Cozy games: Because not everything has to explode to make a good game
Photo [email protected]

Help and suggestions

[email protected] : You are searching for a game, but can't remember the name? Someone will find it for you here.
Video Game [email protected] : Can't find a game to play in among the hundred you already own? Find another one to add to your library here.
Patient [email protected]: Gaming isn't only about having the latest great games. Good old games are there too.

Platform specific

Linux gaming : For everything related to gaming on Linux platform, be it on Steam Deck or Desktop Linux.
Steam Deck : A Steam Deck specific community

Game specific

Language specific

French (jlai.lu)

Others

PM a mod to add your own

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

245

Civilization 7 Outlines Crucial 1.1.1 Update as It Struggles to Compete on Steam Against Civ 6 and Even the 15-Year-Old Civ 5 (www.ign.com)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

103 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (8 children)

Has there even been a Civ release that was great at the start? I had the old Civ 2 "Multiplayer Gold Edition," which my friend, who had the original, said had a much better AI. Give it a little while and see what they can do to make Civ 7 better, then it'll sell well.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Civilization 4 was good at launch. Naturally it got even better over time.

Worth a mention that 4 is the most recent of these games released primary on physical hardware. That meant patching was a more difficult process so they actually had to hire a bunch of play testers to test stuff (and fix the problems they found). Contrast that to the approach of the most recent three games, which had their customers pay $70 for the privilege of being beta testers.

This is a shitty way to develop games. We should be mad about it because we deserve better.

load more comments (7 replies)