this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
1307 points (98.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

11039 readers
598 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is a reason in Australia, the distances travelled and the enormous loads they haul require far more powerful trucks. Look up road trains. They are significantly more efficient than using multiple trucks.

Trains would be more efficient but Australia is too large and too sparsely populated to do everything with trains.

They are also safer for the driver than the Cab over style.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

Power is not the issue. Cabovers can have just as much power as long-hood tractors.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd imagine most road trains to run between cities, or mines, ports, industry, and cities. Building railways between them would certainly make sense, but it'd have to be the state, no single actor alone would make that investment.

What I mean to say is that trains are better and you could have them if you just chose to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

you could have them if you just chose to.

No, you don’t have the first inkling of how much that would cost. Not only would it not be cost effective due to how sparsely populated most of Australia is but no Australian Government could afford it to start with.

Road trains service extremely remote and tiny communities across Australia, as well as supporting many industries. They go off road to reach some of these communities.

You really can’t fathom how remote until you’ve been into the Outback.

Also we do have trains in many places where it makes sense. Not as many as we could have but they’re hardly ignored as an option.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You misunderstand. The trains aren't for the supply of tiny settlements. It's fine to use road vehicles for this. I am specifically talking about industry, cities, ports, mines.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You think Australia doesn’t have any trains?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Of course not. I think Australia could have more. If the Australians wanted to.