this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
442 points (99.3% liked)
Economics
640 readers
129 users here now
founded 2 years ago
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No one is, who doesn't have insider information.
There have been numerous studies on the efficacy of active traders, professional, amateur, institutional, etc.
The results are that the average active trader is no more effective than trading completely randomly.
In fact, somewhere around 80% of major, actively traded hedge funds... underperformed the overall stock market in the last 15 years.
Anytime a 'genuis quant stock wizard' type figures out some new technical strategy that actually works, the other professional technical quants reverse engineer it within hours, days, weeks at max, and then the whole class of fancy pants people have that strategy, thus it stops working.
Thats why 401ks almost all are just indexed funds, mostly made up of a basket of stocks that basically weights the whole DJIA or SP500 by market cap such that you are effectively buying a tiny slice of the entire market.
Imagine that bell curve graph with a caveman gronk on the left saying 'active trading is basically gambling', the nervous dude with 'cool' haircut with a page of text explaining his brilliant trading strategy, and then on the right side, the robed wizard guy saying 'active trading is basically gambling'.
This is so true. For trading the saying "if everyone becomes XYZ no one is". This may make a single person rich, but once a technique is known the market will adapt because everyone uses it and thereby become useless. You can analyse the market as much as you want. You can understand every single thing of it and if this happens you will realise, that the market is truly random. I once saw a good video which explained this, but there is no way I ever gonna find that specific video