this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
941 points (99.0% liked)

Progressive Politics

2176 readers
334 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Absolutely useless

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

LOL

What primaries? The Democrats invented superdelegates to subvert democracy in the primary process, and then argued in court in Florida that it was their right to do so when they were sued for it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Good point. Better to do nothing then. Give up.

Or get more involved in the only party with a chance and change them from the inside?

No, that sounds like work. Forget it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

depends on what you mean by, " get more involved in the only party"

If you mean gut the dems and start over with 100% new leadership and without being at the behest of the rich, I'm in. Otherwise its a pointless pantomime and I'm not interested in playing along in corpo-fascist games any longer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I love the idea. What's the first step we can take to accomplish that?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

tough one. Its not something that comes up often. I'd say for starters we re-register to a new party to get some momentum going. DSA maybe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately then we're back to the FPTP problem. We don't have ranked choice voting, so there can only be two parties.

If we create a new one, we'll need to convince the moderates to join, and the 35% of people who call themselves Democrat like it's a sports team. That's quite a task.

The tea party tried this approach and failed. Then they gave up and infiltrated the Republicans instead. Now they are in charge, rebranded maga.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It is a good point, and I'm not advocating for doing nothing, just acknowledging that change via the Democrats is impossible. Unless you've been asleep for 40 years, you're well aware that real, meaningful change is impossible in this party duopoly, and nothing underscores that more than running a publicly brain-dead man and the entire "progressive" party apparatus lining up behind him in order to suit his fragile, stupid ego.

What I advocate for is doing good with one's own two hands, because that's always possible. Be willing to pick up dog shit even if it's not yours. When someone in your building asks for a favor, be generous with your time. When ICE comes knocking, and they will, find that maybe you have difficulty remembering things. (And if you really want to underscore how shitty the Democrats are, remember that Tom Homan was also Obama's guy.)

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I agree. But my point is that the Democrats are the only tool we have at the moment within the government.

We have plenty of tools outside of the government, and you're 100% right that we should use those as well.

But let's not throw out the one tool we have inside the government. Let's improve it so it's useful.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Let’s improve it so it’s useful.

The devils in the details of that vague proposal. So, sure I guess.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's the thing, we don't.

The Democrats in Washington do not give a fuck about you, me, our families, or anyone else. They exist to do performative things and make nice speeches, then go vote in a manner that can be charitably called conservative but more often enables fascism. For example, remember when they did their nice little stunt kneeling in Congress with their African wear? Those same Democrats linked up behind Biden when he wanted to militarize the police even more.

The only power you or I have is local unless you're willing to commit an extraordinary act of vigilantism or you're a billionaire. That's it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So join local Democrat groups

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Democrats blame progressives for their losses.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Progressives don't exactly show up to vote

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

Great. Really courting that progressive vote with comments like this.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do we have Democrats as a tool inside the government? Are you sure they aren't another of the oligarchs' tools?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

It's both. And they're the most likely group that we could turn to our purposes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

A broken tool is no tool at all

[–] zalgotext 2 points 2 days ago

/c/im14andthisisdeep

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can tell you've never had to sweep or shovel with something when half the haft is gone. Or tear the lid off a garbage can because the mechanism to lift the lid stopped working.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

That's what I've always had to work with when it comes to representatives in this country. It's cuz you and your neo liberal Democratic friends think the rest of us don't deserve working equipment. Only your Rich donors do.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you actually think the person you're replying to has a bunch of neoliberal Dem friends? Do you really believe they have rich donors?

I see this here on lemmy a lot and I'm sorry to tell you no one with the power to do anything is here so you're wasting your energy lecturing. But you got to feel smug and superior so I guess that's something.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It doesn't matter whether they do personally, what matters is that they're carrying the flag for those that do. He believes what they believe. He does what they tell them. What difference is it to me if he's just a dupe or not?. That ideology should just be allowed to spread without challenge? Who does that serve except the neoliberal elite?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Seems like you're just assuming a lot of stuff about someone and that's not at all how I interpreted their statement. Have a nice one.