this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
200 points (100.0% liked)

politics

21001 readers
4620 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio is launching an AI-fueled "Catch and Revoke" effort to cancel the visas of foreign nationals who appear to support Hamas or other designated terror groups, senior State Department officials tell Axios.

They say they're also checking news reports of anti-Israel demonstrations and Jewish students' lawsuits that highlight foreign nationals allegedly engaged in antisemitic activity without consequence.

The State Department is working with the departments of Justice and Homeland Security in what one senior State official called a "whole of government and whole of authority approach."

The big picture: The cumulative effect of Trump's executive orders is already having a chilling effect on student visa-holders. They're starting to shy away from protests critical of Israel.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This is of course bigger than just AI but this kind of thing is one of the things that really bothers me about it. AI is useful for a handful of things, I've mainly just found it useful to help debug code. But the industry puffs it up so much as this revolutionizing force which leads to people doing things like this. Take a tool that is useful in less than a handful of circumstances and have it do EVERYTHING. Because the industry says it can and they wouldn't lie right?

Of course all this will do is revoked visas of brown immigrant students.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

An under-appreciated capability of the current ai is its ability to summarize things: this is where it has the most potential.

  • We’re using speech to text to create transcripts of meetings, which works really well, and are playing with ai summaries. You can only trust them so far but are generally good to see what the meeting covered.
  • similarly ai search, which is currently slow and annoying, but to the extent it is just summarizing the top results, is potentially useful with further improvements
  • just yesterday I had some really good coding results. I was writing unit tests, which do follow a pattern. My ide is great for autocompletion and syntax verification, but the ai was suggesting whole lines and even tests that I could use with minor changes
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Definitely agree. On all your points. I've had AI be able to tell what I'm working on in my IDE and be able to literally complete the rest of my code for what I was doing with minimal errors. It's pretty nuts. Same thing where I was learning a new programming language and the AI was able to help me basically convert my knowledge of prior languages to the new one. It's ability to teach, as long as you continue to ask questions about it because sometimes its first answer is wrong, is really helpful!

I think AI summarization and search are also great. Particularly search can be great for those of us who are both bad at googling things and are tired of the ads. I've had questions that I've googled and have to go through so much to get to the right thing (simple stuff, just differences between stock and broth or whether to throw out meat that has a slight smell to it), but then you ask the AI and boom, there's the answer. And with AI it's a lot easier to do the search, you can just ask the question instead of having to use fancy techniques for getting the right results.

AI has some great uses but the problem is that it's getting used in ways it shouldn't be at all. Like the way the article talks about and in any artistic fashion. AI is a very exact tool, not a catch-all for everything.