Privacy

1264 readers

241 users here now

Protect your privacy in the digital world

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

Be nice, civil and no bigotry/prejudice.
No tankies/alt-right fascists. The former can be tolerated but the latter are banned.
Stay on topic.
Don't promote big-tech software.
No reposting of news that was already posted. Even from different sources.
No crypto, blockchain, etc.
No Xitter links. (only allowed when can't fact check any other way, use xcancel)

Related communities:

founded 3 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

302

Signal is the No. 1 downloaded app in the Netherlands. But why? (techcrunch.com)

submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

135 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

https://lemmy.world/comment/9850401

https://lemmy.world/comment/9805932

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But why do you want to license it at all? It's normally not licensed. When AI vendors break the law they don't care about licenses. Fuck, look at meta.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hmm, did you read the links I posted?

Sure, what meta did is fucked up, but they are being sued. Just because someone ignores the law, does that mean that we should just stop doing something?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, it did not answer my question. Legally you don't have to do anything to make it so corporations legally can't use this for AI unless you signed away your rights and if you signed away your rights you can't change the license back with a notice. So what's it actually for?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I should probably write a blog post about it. Basically it's there to possibly get commercial LLMs in trouble for scraping licensed stuff. LLMs have been tricked into revealing their training data and gotten in trouble for that. There are also ongoing lawsuits due to those revelations. Maybe the most notable is the one against ~~Github's~~ Microsoft's CoPilot for spitting out licensed (GPL and also copyrighted from private repos) code.

Whether the lawsuits will be successful or not is yet to be determined (Japan already considers nearly everything fair game for training AIs and machine learning). Whether they will have an impact if they are successful is also unknown. It just costs me a key-stroke (and the occasional response to a friendly question like yours), so I do it 🤷 Once all my hope is lost, I might stop.

From another answer. I highlighted the important part, which explains why the explicit link to the license text instead of it being implicit.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I see, so it's just a 🤞 maybe this will be useful in court later thing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Yep! You got it 👍 It probably won't, but it costs me all of a few milliseconds to a few seconds. I'm a cynic, but not a defeatist.

Anti Commercial-AI license