this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
204 points (100.0% liked)

World News

41830 readers
5111 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] booly 28 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This is a misconception that should stop.

The Supreme Court ruled that the executive branch can't bring criminal charges against someone for acts that were done as President.

Here's what that doesn't stop:

  • Criminal cases against the former president for non-official acts.
  • Civil cases against the former president for acts, whether official or non-official.
  • Criminal charges against anyone else who wasn't literally the president
  • Civil cases against the government, its agencies, its officers, or its employees.

The Supreme Court fucked up when it said prosecutors can't use official acts as evidence relating to unofficial acts, which basically made it impossible to prosecute a whole bunch of types of crimes.

But what it doesn't do is stop people from suing the government, here and now, for breaking the law, or stop the courts from ordering the government to comply with the law.

And the scope of immunity covers only the President personally. Any other adviser, employee, or officer can still be prosecuted for breaking the law, including following the President's illegal orders.

Part of the Trump strategy right now is to demoralize the opposition and make us believe that he actually has all the power. He doesn't, at least not yet. We shouldn't make it easy for him by assuming that he can break the law with impunity, and instead we should make sure we continue to do everything in our power to hold him and everyone who helps implement his agenda accountable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

The president can Pardon himself and his buddies. Your points mean nothing. The glorious leader is free to do as he likes. That is the world we live in now. Time to wake up.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Pardons don't protect against civil liability. Example: a pardoned person won't go to prison for shooting someone in the leg. But the person who got shot can still sue for pain and suffering etc

[–] [email protected] 4 points 9 hours ago

Civil Liability has done nothing to stop the president from doing anything he wants. Even with judgements against him he says the same things and does the same things. It means nothing other than costing him some money.

[–] booly 1 points 2 minutes ago

You're still too narrowly focused.

The courts can and still do order the executive branch to follow the law, and undo unlawful actions, and order them to follow the law into the future. That's the whole reason why at any given time there are thousands of lawsuits against the government under the Administrative Procedure Act, and the type of lawsuit being brought against Trump's new policies.

If he ignores court orders, that's a constitutional crisis, but it also really fucks up his chain of command. Elon Musk can't fire thousands of people or freeze thousands of contracts, he has to direct the thousands of people who actually control those things to do the paperwork to do that, and those individual civil servants won't violate court orders.

The lawsuits are important, and people need to not roll over and just accept Trump's illegal actions.