this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2025
185 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24543 readers
2681 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

An Arizona court permanently blocked the state’s 15-week abortion ban, citing the 2024 ballot measure enshrining abortion rights in the state constitution.

The ruling follows a legal battle after Arizona briefly reinstated an 1864 near-total ban, sparking national outrage.

While the decision prevents enforcement of the 15-week ban, restrictions like provider requirements and waiting periods remain.

Advocates vow to continue fighting for full abortion access.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 25 points 3 months ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it's about as permanent as you can get within the US's political system. It's not really up for "interpretation" like Roe v. Wade, it's literally just "the State Constitution has changed so this law is now unconstitutional". If a future judge(s) were to overrule this, it would be blatantly and objectively partisan, which is a much bigger deal with state courts than it is Federal ones

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I would not be at all surprised if the case went up to SCOTUS, seeing as how that's the whole point.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

SCOTUS has no jurisdiction over state constitutions.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm not saying the Supremacy Clause isn't a thing. What I'm saying is that SCOTUS has no jurisdiction to decide if a state law violates that state's constitution.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I thought it was an abortion joke

load more comments (5 replies)