this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
147 points (100.0% liked)
World News
783 readers
347 users here now
Rules:
- Be a decent person
- No spam
- Add the byline, or write a line or two in the body about the article.
Other communities of interest:
founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
One difference is that the US contributions have largely been equipment that was close to being decommissioned, which costs money on its own.
This does not make that contributions less important, but should cost the taxpayer much less and was already allocated by the military budget.