this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2025
293 points (97.7% liked)

Canada

9385 readers
1606 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa 4 points 1 month ago (16 children)

The article is about authoritarian takeover, I'm showing that PR doesn't prevent that and might even give them more space than with FPTP, that's all. You're going off on a tangent that wasn't part of the original discussion.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (13 children)

You’re going off on a tangent that wasn’t part of the original discussion.

I'm literally just responding to you, lol

I’m showing that PR doesn’t prevent [authoritarian takeover]

Nobody said PR prevents authoritarian takeover, we just said it protects. And ensuring our democracy is actually representative of its people, does protect us against authoritarianism -- precisely because the power is vested in the people.

I think you need to do a lot of thinking about the functions of electoral systems. I've seen this kind of argument before -- FPTP limits extremism ... but that is far from the truth. And PR simply gets us closer to a better democracy, and yes your argument that "right" wingers get representation -- is a "flaw" with democracy not with PR.

[–] Kecessa 0 points 1 month ago (12 children)

France's far right party would have 214 seats instead of 142 with PR, but sure, PR protects countries from extremism!

[–] terath 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any links to back that up? Seems suspect.

[–] Kecessa 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Look at the results

142 seats right now with 37% of the votes and 577 seats total

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_French_legislative_election

[–] terath 1 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Doesn’t France have a sort of PR in how the multiple rounds work? In any case the system still sends way better than FPTP. Canada has had majorities backed by only 40% of the vote, which is pretty insane.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 month ago

The two-round runoff system France uses is not proportional. It's not even necessarily ensuring an MP is elected by a majority, because there are some situations where the runoff can be contested by more than two people. But it's still a better system than a single round, since it does afford a voter some level of protection against voting against the establishment, at least in the first round

[–] Kecessa 1 points 1 month ago

First round is used to filter out the candidates who don't get enough votes to matter, second round is FPTP but only with the major parties left.

I'm the end the numbers are pretty cut and dry, with PR the far right would have ended getting 50% more seats.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)