this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
1474 points (99.5% liked)

Privacy

34218 readers
1967 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

John Oliver cited a 5000% rise in search queries related to leaving Meta and deleting accounts. Among the topics mentioned in the analysis, attention was drawn to early Facebook's naivete with regard to moderation requirements, the constitutional framework, and a history of governmental interference.

Oliver debunks common right-wing "cry censorship" talking points, as well as the objective difficulty of moderation endeavors, and how direct threats by Trump may have influenced Zuckerberg's turnaround.

Oliver went on to suggest Signal, Mastodon, Bluesky, and Pixelfed as alternatives that "do not seem as desperate to fall in line with Trump". For those reluctant to completely ditch Meta, Oliver revealed a new site with step-by-step instructions to "make yourself less valuable to them".

The guide was a collaboration with the EFF, and includes settings' tweaks for Facebook and Meta, whose 98% of revenue comes from micro-targeting ads, the host previously cited, to increase privacy, and recommends Firefox, Privacy Badger, as "other measures" to take in order "to block advertisers and other third parties from tracking you".

The segment culminated in a mock advert, in which the new Meta's approach to moderation is coined as "Fuck it", and hints to racism, internet scams, and calls to genocide running rampant on Meta's platforms.

The clip reminds the origins of Facebook as a site to "rank college girls by hotness", and its implication in genocide in Myanmar, which was more thoroughly discussed in an Oliver's previous special on Facebook in 2018.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (4 children)

i like that people are leaving zucc platforms but why is that happening suddenly? did he do something exceedingly fascist? did i miss something?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Zuckerberg hung out with Trump at Mar a Lago and attended the inauguration, then got rid of Facebook and Instagram's fact checking, relaxed their rules on posting hate speech and discrimination, ended Meta's diversity initiatives, removed bathroom facilities at meta for transgender and nonbinary employees, made speeches in defence of Trump and expressed gratitude for finally being able to have "a productive partnership with the United States government", while removing communications channels for employees and threatening them with being fired if they talked to media about any of this. He has gone full MAGA.

This article covers some of it: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/30/technology/mark-zuckerberg-meta-trump.html

[–] [email protected] 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (3 children)

thats par for the course for facebook, no? they have always helped the fascists, in my country they literally helped elect one. they helped spread misinformation as if they already didnt care, and the diversity stuff feels just about the same brand of fake to me, so much hate in there.

beggars cant be choosers though so i guess im just glad people are actually mad this time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

They've gone full mask off, which is why there's the sudden backlash. The hate speech rules now include a section that explicitly says that it's okay to call LGBTQ people mentally ill. They're the only group with a specific carve-out in the rules saying that it's okay to post hate speech about them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 18 hours ago

This is the first time zuck has gone full ass-kisser with curly hair and a gold chain, though

[–] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

my country they literally helped elect one

Huh? Source? What country?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

brazil. it was a cambridge analytica sort of deal, where the bad guys paid facebook to milimetrically target fascist propaganda, antivax sentiment, and a bunch of other bullshit to vulnerable people.

they were happy to oblige and even interfered when we tried to regulate this away, a few years later. i hear they abuse it even further on SE asia.

google did different but similarly heinous garbage to us.

edit: you might have a hard time finding it through all of bolsonaro's accusations because hes a piece of shit who laid a lot of it too, but you might find something about the "milicias digitais" or how the far right has been paying off social media to have fascism be favoured in searches and recommendations throughout the country. oh and they still have plenty of influence because of these garbage apps.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 22 hours ago

He only now was able to catch up with all the news with Meta moderation from a month ago. He is only a couple weeks back on air.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

He decided to kiss the ring. People don't like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

AFAIK no, but it takes awhile for everything to sink in, and hosts like John Oliver only have so much air time.