this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2025
188 points (99.0% liked)

Europe

2565 readers
1123 users here now

News and information from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in [email protected]. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @[email protected], @[email protected], or @[email protected].

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thanks guys for answering. As a Dutch person I don't know all the details.

I guess it's really good you guys have a 5% threshold. Here in the Netherlands, things are just too chaotic without it.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, CDU/CSU and SPD have a majority with 45% of the votes, and 14% of the votes did not result in seats. That doesn't sound like an improvement to me. (Compared to the Netherlands - still beter than FPTP systems.)

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I disagree, it's definitely an improvement to the infinite amount of parties we have.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean, you could just not vote for the fringe parties then?

(Oh, you already don't do that? So it's other people's votes you want to cancel? See what I mean - arguing for a threshold is essentially arguing for less democracy.)

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

It's not about cancelling anyone. It's about not having to wait 200-300 days to get a new government after every election.

I have often voted for very small parties and they never make it into the coalition. I really wouldn't mind if they didn't make it into Parliament either.

It's not like the BSW or FDP voters really lost that much - their parties would be doomed to be opposition anyway. Their voters knew that was a likely outcome based on the polls. And next election they might reach the threshold.

But the country as a whole gains efficiency.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

The question then is: why did you vote for those very small parties? Why not just vote VVD? Then you're basically sure that they'll make the coalition, and your vote contributes to a nice and quick coalition process.

(That said, I also strongly disagree that being in opposition means you can't achieve anything. Look at the PVV, and how much they were able to make the other parties when they weren't even part of the government. Looks at what Union is planning to do now because of AfD, without AfD having to be part of the coalition.)

Edit: oh, and I forgot maybe the most convincing argument, for you: it doesn't work. Reasonable thresholds do not lead to fewer parties.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It's not about fewer parties in elections, it's about fewer parties in Parliament and quickly having a stable government.

Your link is written by an idiot.

In Germany you can still vote for a small party. If enough people do, the party gets 5%, or about 32 seats, which are enough MP's to actually participate in the process without getting burned out.

We could also start in the Netherlands with 2%, which is 3 MP's.

I think 4% (6 MP's) would be better though.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

OK, if you're dismissing a source just because it doesn't fit your preconceived notions, even though it's written by someone who's literal job is to research the subject, and provides the numbers to back it up, then I'm not sure what we're doing here.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

Some people suck at their job.

It is what it is.

In any case, Germany will probably have a government within a month, two if things get crazy.

And that's cold hard facts.