this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2025
831 points (98.8% liked)

World News

41185 readers
3514 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump is pushing for softer language on Russia’s war in Ukraine, straining G7 unity.

Officials say the U.S. is blocking references to "Russian aggression" and prefers calling it the "Ukraine conflict."

This shift follows Trump's peace talks with Putin that excluded Ukraine's President Zelensky, whom Trump later called a "dictator."

The change in rhetoric contrasts with Biden-era support for Ukraine and threatens a unified G7 stance.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago (24 children)

But I couldn't vote for Harris because that was a vote for genocide.

[–] NobodyElse 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In maybe the most important race of this country’s history, Harris couldn’t bring herself to denounce genocide and war crimes like a decent human being and instead chose to support a corrupt, fascist foreign nation that more closely resembles Nazi Germany than another country today.

Party loyalists tut-tut at the voters and learn exactly nothing, yet again.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Party loyalists tut-tut at the voters and learn exactly nothing, yet again.

The non-voters voted in Trump who is trying to be more fascist and corrupt than the other country you’re alluding to.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The democrats who voted surprisingly voted for Harris so I don’t know what you’re on about.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Democrats politicians who didn't put Trump away and refuses to let go of their billionaire money for the sake of most important election the US is facing yet are the ones who voted Trump in. Blaming the non-voters is just playing into the oligarch's hand.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In our system the votes get counted to figure out who won so the non-voters said they are okay with what’s happening.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

So the non-voters all have future sight and can already see that Trump will win? Maybe what they actually thought was that neither side will actually help them and they are not informed enough to know that Trump will win without their help, have you ever thought about that? Seems all you actually care about is helping the oligarchy, so maybe you don't even care to think.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Hey there’s no need to be getting personal just because you don’t agree with me.

Not voting means you support whoever wins, that’s all I’m saying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not being personal, I'm simply stating that insisting to push that agenda makes you a supporter of oligarchy. Attacking non-voters won't make them want to vote more, it makes them disassociate even more from politics, which is exactly what the oligarchs want, so you can go ahead and prove your support for Trump's takeover by continuing to help his cause.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Non voters aren’t worth going after.

The liberals will still keep voting so the DNC should ignore the left that have already abandoned them and go after the moderate right instead.

At least they consistently vote.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Like what they did in this election? How did that work out for them?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

The liberal candidate barely lost while the progressive candidate didn’t even get a million votes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What progressive candidate? I didn't know the Dems even considered a progressive candidate?

Oh, did you mean Jill Stein? So you consider her a progressive candidate now? What happened to all the Dems calling her a Russian asset?

Funny how people like you count her as a progressive candidate when you want to attack progressives, but dismiss her completely whenever people are talking about alternatives to Kamala.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Would you rather talk about Rachele Fruit from the Socialist Workers Party’s total of 4,225 votes?

She only needed 77,298,355 more votes to beat Trump!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Then, would you rather talk about first past the post and how even with that help, the Democrats can't even beat an idiot like Trump? Why would you think that there are that many people who would vote for a third party that will never win anything vs the DNC if they had been bothered to listen to their support base? The Democrats only have themselves to blame for losing the election.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

Again the DNC barely lost.

They beat Trump in 2020.

load more comments (22 replies)