this post was submitted on 18 Feb 2025
47 points (86.2% liked)
Linux Gaming
16387 readers
821 users here now
Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME
away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.
This page can be subscribed to via RSS.
Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.
Resources
WWW:
Discord:
IRC:
Matrix:
Telegram:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I've run it without issues, on a much newer system.
I don't know why it wouldn't run at all, but as you point out, you're running it on a pair of pretty low-end systems. One is from six years prior to the game's release without discrete video, and the other came out in the same year, but is a very low-end system with no discrete video card; those things aren't really aimed at playing 3d games. I don't think that you'd likely be happy with performance even if it ran.
https://store.steampowered.com/app/323190/Frostpunk/
Windows:
Mac:
My experience is that minimum requirements tend to be kind of optimistic.
The minimum system requirements specify a discrete video card.
You've got an 8GB RAM Surface Go with a non-discrete GPU and no VRAM, and a 16GB RAM Macbook also with a non-discrete GPU that had been around for six years prior to the game's release.
I've never returned a game, but IIRC Steam does have a refund policy for a short period of time after purchase, so if you buy a game and it doesn't run, you can refund it.
goes looking
https://store.steampowered.com/steam_refunds/
EDIT: Here's a Passmark comparison of your two Intel integrated video things and the lowest-end video card they list in their system requirements, a Geforce GTX 660. This gives a score to give a rough idea of how they'd compare in relative terms:
https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare/2152vs2vs3593/GeForce-GTX-660-vs-Intel-HD-4000-vs-Intel-HD-615
GeForce GTX 660: 4013
Intel HD 4000: 348
Intel HD 615: 705
I mean, you might get it running, but I'm skeptical that you'd have a good experience with it.
EDIT2:
Their "recommended" card is a GeForce GTX 970. Adding that:
https://www.videocardbenchmark.net/compare/2152vs2vs3593vs2954/GeForce-GTX-660-vs-Intel-HD-4000-vs-Intel-HD-615-vs-GeForce-GTX-970
GeForce GTX 970: 9634
EDIT3: Hmm. I've never really thought about it, but you'd think that Valve could get minimum requirements plonked into a database, and then have the Steam client, which can see your hardware -- assuming that you're shopping from the Steam client -- warn you on the game page if your system doesn't meet them.
Thanks for the precise and detailed answer.
Yeah I guess I clearly have to give up on playing games less than 10 years old, even on the more powerful MacBook.
FWIW I think the Surface is the more powerful machine.
I wouldn't bother with any 3D AAA that came out after ~2010 on the Mac and even then you're looking at 720p 30FPS
The Surface looks like it might be a solid light indie game machine. I doubt it'll struggle too much with anything 2D and may even be able to run late PS3/super early PS4 era (before 2015) 3D games at reasonable framerates.
I guess I clearly overstimated the graphical power of the MacBook because it feels so snappy for admin work. The Surface too, but a fraction slower.
If I want to get into Linux gaming, I’ll have to work on my benchmarking skills😅
That extra 8GB of RAM is probably doing a lot of the heavy lifting to make general use smoother. More RAM = less swapping to the drive when memory fills up (which on 8GB means ~5 tabs in a browser before it starts slowing down haha).