this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
547 points (84.5% liked)

Linux

50350 readers
1704 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Arch is aimed at people who know their shit so they can build their own distro based on how they imagine their distro to be. It is not a good distro for beginners and non power users, no matter how often you try to make your own repository, and how many GUI installers you make for it. There's a good reason why there is no GUI installer in arch (aside from being able to load it into ram). That being that to use Arch, you need to have a basic understanding of the terminal. It is in no way hard to boot arch and type in archinstall. However, if you don't even know how to do that, your experience in whatever distro, no matter how arch based it is or not, will only last until you have a dependency error or some utter and total Arch bullshit® happens on your system and you have to run to the forums because you don't understand how a wiki works.

You want a bleeding edge distro? Use goddamn Opensuse Tumbleweed for all I care, it is on par with arch, and it has none of the arch stuff.

You have this one package that is only available on arch repos? Use goddamn flatpak and stop crying about flatpak being bloated, you probably don't even know what bloat means if you can't set up arch. And no, it dosent run worse. Those 0,0001 seconds don't matter.

You really want arch so you can be cool? Read the goddamn 50 page install guide and set it up, then we'll talk about those arch forks.

(Also, most arch forks that don't use arch repos break the aur, so you don't even have the one thing you want from arch)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pastermil 18 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (2 children)

AFAIK no systemd -> no flatpak -> don't recommend to newbs. Say what you will about flatpak, but it is the official distribution method for some popular pieces of software and large GUI software generally works better through it (in my experience) - think Blender, GIMP etc.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

also systemd is just assumed in 99% of Linux tutorials and questions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No software worth its salt offers only flatpak installation. I don't use flatpak at all and Blender works flawlessly. I'm not sure what a flatpak version could possibly do any better than the version I use.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm not sure what a flatpak version could possibly do any better than the version I use.

The official OBS flatpak supports more codecs and integrations than some distro packages.

Stability is also a factor, especially on rolling or cutting edge distros. Fedora RPM release of Blender did not work for me at all with an nvidia GPU, for example.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

nvidia GPU

No flavour of Linux works well with them. That's the joke or something.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

funnily enough, i see it as one of the advantages of arch, and a reason i'll keep putting up with the constant updating for the forseeable future - nvidia support has gotten way better recently, and since arch has very recent packages i haven't had nvidia issues in quite a while now.

Once it all lands in debian i'll consider giving debian another shot on desktop... but that'll take a while.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

But we're not talking about rolling or cutting edge distros. MX is based on Debian Stable. Also last time I checked (about a month ago) MX Linux does support Flatpak. Also also, you can enable systemd if you want, but seeing as we're talking about a distro for complete beginners, I don't think they're going to notice, know, or care. Also also also, I really don't care enough about this to drag it out into some protracted argument.

Download ventoy, slap a few distros on a usb stick, try them, use what you like.

[–] pastermil 2 points 4 days ago

That's arguable, but I get where you're coming from.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 4 days ago (3 children)

And then wonder why everybody having a good time with their nvidia on smooth wayland vs you on your ~~ancient~~, ok now only old Kernel since the last ubuntu upgrade, and outdated nvidia drivers.

Oh wait, with mint, you are forced to use clunky Xorg aren’t you

I am sure that gives any noob the vibes of using a modern OS like windows/macOS /s

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I'm not sure a newcomer will notice the difference between xorg and wayland?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

If you have multiple monitors with different refresh rates, you'll notice immediately.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I did, before I knew what wayland is, I did some distrohopping (see path below), and recognised that sometimes it feels more nice than other times. First I thought it was just GPU driver stuff, but later learned that it was something called wayland that does something underneath your desktop management (didn’t know that there is another layer below at that time)

(mint->manjaro->manjaro(after it died once)->Opensuse TW(after manjaro died again)->Arch(because I liked installing from AUR more than from suse community hub)->EndeavourOS(because I don’t have time to do Arch manually and archinstall was to difficult/time consuming with dualbooting macOS)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

wayland is still too unstable for me to recommend. what is clunky about xorg?

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Do you use a modern kernel? And, do you use a multi touch trackpad? That only works on wayland well.

I personally see the difference in for example window movement Xorg VS wayland. And I have more artefacts from window manager if use Xorg BS when O use wayland.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

yes, yes, and it works without tearing in xorg no problem. multitouch is not xorgs nor wayland's responsibility.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

Umm no. Xorg only knows keyboard and pointer devices

Everything must be put into one of those in hacky ways to work with Xorg, meaning you using a protocol for a device that can move itself, scroll and register clicks and keyboard to multitouch efects

This, for example, results in swiping on Xorg is just clicking a keyboard shortcut, while in wayland you can smoothly scroll for and back between the virtual desktops mid animations

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Mint works like Windows and has a lot to offer any Windows 10 user who's already using FOSS. And tbh Hypnotix alone justified the install of Mint for me. I got a great IPTV viewer, plus a PC that runs everything I want.

Note: I only regularly want Discord, Firefox, Endless Sky, OpenTTD, RetroArch, and LibreOffice. I'm sure everyone else has different goals.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Windows 10 doesn’t feel like a modern OS…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Then whatever a modern OS is under your model is not an OS I'm willing to use. I've seen Win 11. I'm going to stick with 10, as I stuck with XP through Vista, had a second machine with 7 through 8(.x), and then surrendered and used Win10 when the 32-bit Win7 machine finally stopped working for love or money.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Well that is fair and I am very glad that Linux still offers you what you need and that you are fine with using X and have (still) more compatibility like this 😇