this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
272 points (80.9% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

840 readers
336 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Not really "powertripping". Just pathetic. Consider this a notice to avoid feddit.org... I've unsubbed and blocked the instance.

We can't dehumanize fascists for their choice to dehumanize everyone for things outside their control though, because that would be mean, and hurt their sociopath feefees!

Europe stool idly by throughout the 1930's "tolerating" fascism, and the Nazi's killed over 100 million people. Don't make the same mistake as the radical centrists of history. Fascists will not afford you the same tolerance or courtesy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 40 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

They seem to only have a rule against dehumanisation of minorities, where the term is pretty clearly intended to mean minorities generally subject to persecution/bigotry:

4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.

I feel the ban is a bit over the top, anyway. I get the post being removed for being a bit too aggressive, but to immediately ban over (what I presume) is a first offence... I'd simply give a warning myself.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Another rule is that all contents have to follow German, Austrian and Switzerland's laws. Under German law the comment that got deleted is incitement of people and therefore it was right to delete it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

Yeah, in that case I understand.

[–] Skiluros 19 points 5 days ago

Ban is definitely over the top.

Sometimes less is more with respect to rhetoric (not saying there aren't situations were you have to be clear and uncompromising in your statements).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Saying "nazi lives don't matter" isn't even "dehumanizing".

Dehumanization is Trump calling immigrants rapists and criminals, and associating them with insects, rodents, and pests.

Dehumanization is banning every government department from acknowledging the existence of women, LGBTQ+, minorities, etc, and ordering them to erase any mention of their history.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You're not gonna see this as you blocked feddit.org, also geh dahin wo der Pfeffer wächst!

For everyone else:

Saying "nazi lives don't matter" isn't even "dehumanizing".

Doubtful from a legal point of view

Dehumanization is Trump calling immigrants rapists and criminals, and associating them with insects, rodents, and pests.

Dehumanization is banning every government department from acknowledging the existence of women, LGBTQ+, minorities, etc, and ordering them to erase any mention of their history.

Basically everyone on feddit.org agrees with this, so this whole rambling doesn't make any sense. Two things can be true at the same time.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Doubtful from a legal point of view

Can you quote the section of German law you based this assessment on?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/stgb/__130.html

(1) Anyone who, in a manner that is likely to disturb the public peace,

  1. incites hatred against a national, racial, religious or ethnic group, against sections of the population or against an individual because of his or her membership of the aforementioned group or a section of the population, or incites violence or arbitrary measures, or
  2. attacks the human dignity of others by insulting, maliciously denigrating or defaming a designated group, sections of the population or an individual because of their membership of a designated group or a section of the population,

shall be liable to a custodial sentence of three months to five years.

And according to https://kujus-strafverteidigung.de/strafrecht/volksverhetzung/ the protected groups include

Gruppen mit einer bestimmten weltanschaulichen Überzeugung (Groups with a certain view or conviction)

Which one could concievably put Nazis into (although their views are shit they're still views)

https://www.anwalt.org/volksverhetzung/#absatz-1-nr-1-stoerung-des-oeffentlichen-friedens-durch-aufruf-zu-hass-und-gewalt Further provides the following explanation for attacks against human dignity:

Dem Täter kommt es aus verwerflichen Beweggründen darauf an, andere Menschen als besonders minderwertig, unwürdig und verachtenswert darzustellen. (For reprehensible motives, the perpetrator aims to portray other people as particularly inferior, unworthy and despicable.)

I would think saying someones live does not matter constitutes them as unworthy (of life).

[–] [email protected] -3 points 4 days ago

Thank you, first answer with a merit. Although 1 definitely doesn't apply. 2 you can argue about but I doubt it.

[–] Skiluros 15 points 5 days ago

Agreed regarding Trump and dehumanization. I am Ukrainian, so you can imagine what I think of Trump, his goons and even those who support Trump (Americans or otherwise).

I am almost arguing from a devil's advocate point of view.

To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if the mods at a high level support your views (in a different more nuanced phrasing), but you do have to have a modicum of fairness when approaching a rule like "no dehumanization". The style/tone of your comment did conflict with the rules, that's all I am saying.