this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2025
20 points (91.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5818 readers
712 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
20
Will There Be Enough Power to Remove Carbon From the Sky? | The direct air capture industry has ambitious plans to pull carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, but it’s vying for limited renewable power (messaging-custom-newsletters.nytimes.com)
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Title & subtitle from the article version of this newsletter

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The capture industry is a scam by the big players to suck up government money that should be spent on prevention of the emissions instead.